Host: 上海立信会计金融学院

  • ISSN 2096-9554
  • CN 31-2074/F
Volume 39 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zeng Xueyun, Gao Yifei, Xia Wende. 2025. Transaction Characteristics and Fair Pricing Mechanisms in Multi-sided Markets of Trusted Data Spaces. Accounting and Economic Research, 39(4): 33-49.
Citation: Zeng Xueyun, Gao Yifei, Xia Wende. 2025. Transaction Characteristics and Fair Pricing Mechanisms in Multi-sided Markets of Trusted Data Spaces. Accounting and Economic Research, 39(4): 33-49.

Transaction Characteristics and Fair Pricing Mechanisms in Multi-sided Markets of Trusted Data Spaces

  • Received Date: 2025-04-17
    Available Online: 2026-03-13
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-20
  • The data element market is shifting from a direct bilateral supply-and-demand trading structure to a multi-party transaction model based on trusted data spaces. However, prior research has not yet adequately explained the transaction characteristics of trusted data spaces. This study focuses on the market pricing mechanism within trusted data space, clearly clarifies transaction subjects and objects from a multi-sided market perspective, analyzes the transaction characteristics across two phases—the cold-start phase and the orderly phase—and designs corresponding pricing mechanisms. The study reveals that during the cold-start phase, the market exhibits low participant activity, difficulties in internalizing positive externalities, cost shifting, and pricing mechanism failures. To address these issues, an asymmetric pricing mechanism incorporating cost compensation and option contracts is proposed to stimulate market vitality and facilitate the transition from the cold-start phase to the orderly phase. In the orderly phase, transactions are characterized by scale, product standardization, and risk sharing. Under the principle of fair pricing, three pricing models are advanced: a cost-based fundamental fair pricing model, a market-based competitive fair pricing model, and an incentive-based revenue-sharing fair pricing model, all aimed at improving pricing efficiency in multilateral markets. This study provides a theoretical foundation for phased pricing in data multilateral markets within trusted data spaces, contributing to the development and prosperity of the data element market.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    包晓丽. 2024. 可信数据空间: 技术与制度二元共治. 浙江学刊 (1): 89−100.
    [2]
    高富平, 冉高苒. 2022. 数据要素市场形成论——一种数据要素治理的机制框架. 上海经济研究 (9): 70−86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1309.2022.09.007
    [3]
    李三希, 林心仪, 兰森. 2024. 数据要素市场化: 数据交易平台建设路径探析——基于北京国际大数据交易所的案例分析. 江西社会科学 (10): 69−82.
    [4]
    林娟娟, 黄志刚, 唐勇. 2025. 数据质量、数量与数据资产定价: 基于消费者异质性视角. 中国管理科学 (5): 88−98. doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0444
    [5]
    刘源, 喻迎, 陈宏民. 2024. 数据产品开发的激励机制研究: 道德风险理论视角. 管理评论 (6): 19−29.
    [6]
    陆正飞. 2018. 对会计的制度逻辑和本质的思考——《公允价值计量与金融市场风险》一书评析. 财务与会计 (17): 84−85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-286X.2018.17.038
    [7]
    欧阳日辉, 龚伟. 2022. 基于价值和市场评价贡献的数据要素定价机制. 改革 (3): 39−54.
    [8]
    钱锦琳, 夏义堃, 王雪. 2025. “理论−政策”协同视角下欧盟数据空间政策研究: 适配性诊断与中国镜鉴. 电子政务(网络首发).
    [9]
    秦荣生. 2020. 企业数据资产的确认、计量与报告研究. 会计与经济研究 (6): 3−10.
    [10]
    苏宇, 卢怡. 2024. 数据要素可信交易流通: 共同数据空间的制度塑成. 电子政务 (12): 53−64.
    [11]
    吴江, 袁一鸣, 贺超城, 钱龙, 杜乐, 缪佳蕊. 2024. 数据要素交易多边平台研究: 现状、进路与框架. 信息资源管理学报 (3): 4−20. doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2024.03.004
    [12]
    席轩, 张玉林. 2024. 考虑数据优势的在线平台数据投资和定价决策. 中国管理科学(12): 87−99.
    [13]
    夏义堃, 程铄, 王雪, 钱锦琳. 2024. 数据空间建设的实践进展与运营模式分析——基于Data Spaces Radar的案例. 图书与情报 (2): 18−32.
    [14]
    熊巧琴, 汤珂. 2021. 数据要素的界权、交易和定价研究进展. 经济学动态 (2): 143−158.
    [15]
    杨东, 高清纯. 2023. 双边市场理论视角下数据交易平台规制研究. 法治研究 (2): 97−110.
    [16]
    曾雪云. 2014. 公允价值计量与金融市场风险. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
    [17]
    曾雪云. 2016. 公允价值会计准则的发展历程: 1975−2015. 金融理论探索 (4): 8−15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3544.2016.04.003
    [18]
    曾雪云. 2023. 货币型权益工具: 基于区块链自治组织的通证发行、技术信任与治理创新. 金融市场研究 (9): 79−90.
    [19]
    曾雪云, 费一洋, 夏文德. 2025. 数据基础设施建设支出的资本化: 基于资产与盈余的双重检验. 会计研究 (6): 92−106.
    [20]
    Armstrong, M. 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics 37(3): 668−691. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
    [21]
    Arrow, K. J. 1972. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. London: Palgrave.
    [22]
    Bhargava, H. K., G. Csapó, and R. Müller. 2020. On optimal auctions for mixing exclusive and shared matching in platforms. Management Science 66(6): 2653−2676. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3309
    [23]
    Curry, E., W. Derguech, S. Hasan, C. Kouroupetroglou, and U. ul Hassan. 2019. A real-time linked dataspace for the internet of things: Enabling “pay-as-you-go” data management in smart environments. Future Generation Computer Systems 90: 405−422.
    [24]
    de Reuver, M., C. Sørensen, and R. C. Basole. 2018. The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology 33: 124−135. doi: 10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
    [25]
    Franklin, M., A. Halevy, and D. Maier. 2005. From databases to dataspaces: A new abstraction for information management. ACM Sigmod Record 34(4): 27−33. doi: 10.1145/1107499.1107502
    [26]
    Hagiu, A. 2009. Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18(4): 1011−1043.
    [27]
    Henfridsson, O., and B. Bygstad. 2013. The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly 37(3): 907−931. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
    [28]
    International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2011. IFRS 13: Fair value measurement.
    [29]
    Jain, S., and K. Qian. 2021. Compensating online content producers: A theoretical analysis. Management Science 67(11): 7075−7090. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3862
    [30]
    Jones, C. I., and C. Tonetti. 2020. Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review 110(9): 2819−2858. doi: 10.1257/aer.20191330
    [31]
    Kalogeropoulos, I., M. E. Vlontzou, N. Psaromanolakis, E. Zarogianni, and V. Theodorou. 2023. Edgeds: Data spaces enabled multi-access edge computing. 2023 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (EuCNC/6G Summit).
    [32]
    Katz, M. L., and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review 75(3): 424−440.
    [33]
    Liang, L., and E. J. Riedl. 2014. The effect of fair value versus historical cost reporting model on analyst forecast accuracy. The Accounting Review 89(3): 1151−1177. doi: 10.2308/accr-50687
    [34]
    Majumdar, R., A. Gurtoo, and M. Maileckal. 2025. Developing a data pricing framework for data exchange. Future Business Journal 11, 4. doi: 10.1186/s43093-025-00422-z
    [35]
    Mclntyre, D. P., and A. Srinivasan. 2017. Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal 38(1): 141−160. doi: 10.1002/smj.2596
    [36]
    Möller, F., I. Jussen, V. Springer, A. Gieß, J. C. Schweihoff, J. Gelhaar, T. Guggenberger and B. Otto. 2024. Industrial data ecosystems and data spaces. Electronic Markets 34(1), 41. doi: 10.1007/s12525-024-00724-0
    [37]
    Nagel, L., J. J. Hierro, E. Perea, D. Lycklama, C. Mertens, A. S. Taillandier, and A. Grguric. 2021. Design principles for data spaces: Position paper. International Data Spaces Association.
    [38]
    Otto, B. 2022. The evolution of data spaces. Otto, B., M. ten Hompel, and S. Wrobel. Designing Data spaces: The ecosystem approach to competitive advantage. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [39]
    Otto, B., and M. Jarke. 2019. Designing a multi-sided data platform: Findings from the international data spaces case. Electronic Markets 29(4): 561−580. doi: 10.1007/s12525-019-00362-x
    [40]
    Parker, G. G., and M. W. Van Alstyne. 2005. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science 51(10): 1494−1504. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
    [41]
    Pickerd, J., and M. D. Piercey. 2021. The effects of high estimate uncertainty in auditor negligence litigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(4): 3182−3213. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12685
    [42]
    Pigou, A. C. 1920. The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.
    [43]
    Prigogine, I. 1987. Exploring complexity. European Journal of Operational Research 30(2): 97−103.
    [44]
    Prüfer, J., and C. Schottmüller. 2021. Competing with big data. The Journal of Industrial Economics 69(4): 967−1008. doi: 10.1111/joie.12259
    [45]
    Rochet, J. C., and J. Tirole. 2006. Two-sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics 37(3): 645−667. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
    [46]
    Sánchez-Cartas, J. M., and G. León. 2021. Multisided platforms and markets: A survey of the theoretical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 35(2): 452−487. doi: 10.1111/joes.12409
    [47]
    Tan, B., S. L. Pan, X. Lu, and L. Huang. 2015. The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16(4): 248−280. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00393
    [48]
    Tan, G., and J. Zhou. 2021. The effects of competition and entry in multi-sided markets. The Review of Economic Studies 88(2): 1002−1030. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdaa036
    [49]
    Williamson, O. E. 1983. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review 73(4): 519−540.
    [50]
    Williamson, O. E. 1986. The economic institutions of capitalism. The Antitrust Bulletin 31(3): 827−834. doi: 10.1177/0003603X8603100308
    [51]
    Xiao, Z., D. He, and J. Du. 2020. A Stackelberg game pricing through balancing trilateral profits in big data market. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8(16): 12658−12668.
    [52]
    Xing, A., and H. Wang. 2024. Pricing and sample set strategies of data providers under quality information asymmetry. Journal of the Operational Research Society 75(2): 278−296. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2189907
    [53]
    Yu, H., and M. Zhang. 2017. Data pricing strategy based on data quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering 112: 1−10.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article views (28) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Link 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return