Host: Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance
Host: 上海立信会计金融学院
- ISSN 2096-9554
- CN 31-2074/F
Host: Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance
Host: 上海立信会计金融学院
| Citation: | Xu Jinye. 2024. A Study on Intelligence Discernment of Audit Robots. Accounting and Economic Research, 38(5): 25-43.
|
| [1] |
高新民, 罗岩超. 2021. “图灵测试”与人工智能元问题探微. 江汉论坛 (1): 56−64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2021.01.008
|
| [2] |
黄素珍. 2020. 人工智能的责任困境: 以自主能动性和道德图灵测试为探讨中心. 山东社会科学 (4): 11−18.
|
| [3] |
兰梅. 2022. 意向性与内涵性——意向状态和对意向状态描述的语句. 西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (4): 68−74.
|
| [4] |
李康. 2021. “中文屋论证”与人工智能. 文化学刊 (4): 98−101.
|
| [5] |
李珍. 2018. 论集体意向性的个体化——批判性考察塞尔的集体意向性理论. 科学技术哲学研究 (4): 14−19.
|
| [6] |
鲁清仿, 燕万年, 王开一, 胡友良. 2018. 智慧审计构想与实践探索——基于解构法律法规条款. 审计研究 (1): 28−34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4239.2018.01.006
|
| [7] |
钱圆媛. 2022. 责任缺口、道德图灵测试与可担责的人工智能道德体. 自然辩证法研究 (6): 22−28.
|
| [8] |
孙会. 2021.人类会被人工智能取代吗? ——模仿、理解与智能. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版) (3): 140−150.
|
| [9] |
王运豪. 2022. 现象学视域下的黑格尔意向性理论. 内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (2): 34−41.
|
| [10] |
许金叶. 2022. 智能会计理论基础: “会计信息系统论”的发展——纪念余绪缨教授诞辰100周年. 财务研究 (1): 38−48.
|
| [11] |
徐英瑾. 2011. 人工智能科学在十七、十八世纪欧洲哲学中的观念起源. 复旦学报(社会科学版) (1): 78−90.
|
| [12] |
于剑. 2020. 图灵测试的明与暗. 计算机研究与发展 (5): 906−911. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2020.20190794
|
| [13] |
张庆龙, 何佳楠, 芮柏松. 2021. 新时期内部审计创新之路: 从数据审计到智能审计. 财会月刊 (22): 78−83.
|
| [14] |
张庆龙, 邢春玉, 芮柏松, 崔楠. 2020. 新一代内部审计: 数字化与智能化. 审计研究 (5): 113−121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4239.2020.05.014
|
| [15] |
张秋成. 2021. 意向性理论及其对现当代西方哲学“对话”与“融合”的价值. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版) (6): 7−16.
|
| [16] |
张伟特. 2022. 笛卡尔与人工智能: “我思故我在”作为智能测试标准的可能性. 科学·经济·社会 (3): 38−55.
|
| [17] |
张子夏, 薛少华. 2021. 斯派洛的“图灵分类测试”. 自然辩证法研究 (9): 122−128.
|
| [18] |
Ademollo, F. 2011. The cratylus of plato: A commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [19] |
Bates, D. 2013. Cartesian robotics. Representations 124(1): 43−44. doi: 10.1525/rep.2013.124.1.43
|
| [20] |
Brentano, F. 1995. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Oxford: Routlege Press.
|
| [21] |
Chisholm, R. 1981. The first person: An essay on reference and intentionality. Cambridge: The Harvard Press.
|
| [22] |
Coxon, K. T. 2003. Empathy, intersubjectivity, and virtue. Dalhousie University.
|
| [23] |
Decety, J., and P. L. Jackson. 2004. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 3(2): 71−100. doi: 10.1177/1534582304267187
|
| [24] |
Decety, J., and P. L. Jackson. 2006. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions In Psychological Science 15(2): 54−58. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
|
| [25] |
Eisenberg, N., and J. Strayer. 1987. Critical issues in the study of empathy. Eisenberg, N., and Strayer, J. Empathy and its development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [26] |
Harnad, S. 1989. Minds, machines and searl. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1(1): 5−25.
|
| [27] |
Hofman, M. L. 1987. The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgement. Eisenberg, N., and Strayer, J. Empathy and its development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [28] |
Jackson, P. L., A. N. Meltzoff., and J. Decety. 2005. How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 24(3): 771−779. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006
|
| [29] |
Jackson, P. L., P. Rainville, and J. Decety. 2006. To what extent do we share the pain of others? Insight from the neural bases of pain empathy. Pain 125(1-2): 5−9.
|
| [30] |
Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3): 417−457.
|
| [31] |
Sparrow, R. 2004. The turing triage test. Ethics and Information Technology 6(4): 203−213. doi: 10.1007/s10676-004-6491-2
|
| [32] |
Turing, A. M. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy LXI(236): 433−460.
|
| [33] |
Walter, H. 2012. Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits and genes. Emotion Review 4(3): 9−17.
|
Figures(1) / Tables(1)
DownLoad: