Host: 上海立信会计金融学院

  • ISSN 2096-9554
  • CN 31-2074/F
Volume 35 Issue 1
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Shen Yongtao, Chen Song, Zhou Rui, Wang Hongjian. 2021. Interest Rate Marketization Reform and the Firms’ High-quality Development: Empirical Evidence from a Perspective of Credit Capital Flow. Accounting and Economic Research, 35(1): 77-91.
Citation: Shen Yongtao, Chen Song, Zhou Rui, Wang Hongjian. 2021. Interest Rate Marketization Reform and the Firms’ High-quality Development: Empirical Evidence from a Perspective of Credit Capital Flow. Accounting and Economic Research, 35(1): 77-91.

Interest Rate Marketization Reform and the Firms’ High-quality Development: Empirical Evidence from a Perspective of Credit Capital Flow

  • Received Date: 2020-01-13
  • Publish Date: 2021-01-25
  • Taking the full liberalization of China’s loan interest rate in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment and constructing a double differential model based on differences in the productivity of enterprises, we find that: (1) The marketization of loan interest rate can significantly turn around the reverse flow of credit capital in that it promotes the flow of credit capital from low-productivity to higher-productivity in private enterprises, but it has no significant influence on the state-owned enterprises; (2) The reversal effect of the loan interest rate marketization on the reverse flow of credit capital helps private enterprises transform extensional development to connotative development, but it has little effects on state-owned enterprises. We reveals the mechanism about the microeconomic effect of loan interest rate marketization from the perspective of the credit capital reverse flow, and provides micro-evidence for the causal relationship between the reform of interest rate marketization and the high-quality development of the real economy.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    方芳, 蔡卫星. 2016. 银行业竞争与企业成长: 来自工业企业的经验证据. 管理世界 (7): 63−75.
    [2]
    方军雄. 2007. 所有制、制度环境与信贷资金配置. 经济研究 (12): 82−92.
    [3]
    何光辉, 杨咸月. 2012. 融资约束对企业生产率的影响—基于系统GMM方法的国企与民企差异检验. 数量经济技术经济研究 (5): 19−35.
    [4]
    侯青川, 靳庆鲁, 陈明端. 2015. 经济发展、政府偏袒与公司发展—基于政府代理问题与公司代理问题的分析. 经济研究 (1): 140−152.
    [5]
    黄速建, 肖红军, 王欣. 2018. 论国有企业高质量发展. 中国工业经济 (10): 19−41.
    [6]
    纪洋, 王旭, 谭语嫣, 黄益平. 2018. 经济政策不确定性、政府隐性担保与企业杠杆率分化. 经济学(季刊) (2): 449−470.
    [7]
    姜付秀, 张敏, 陆正飞, 陈才东. 2009. 管理者过度自信、企业扩张与财务困境. 经济研究 (1): 131−143.
    [8]
    李斌, 江伟. 2006. 金融发展、融资约束与企业成长. 南开经济研究 (3): 68−78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4691.2006.03.006
    [9]
    李青原, 王红建. 2013. 货币政策、资产可抵押性、现金流与公司投资—来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据. 金融研究 (6): 31−45.
    [10]
    林毅夫. 2014. 转型国家需要有效市场和有为政府. 中国经济周刊 (6): 78−79.
    [11]
    刘俏. 2012. “资本流向”之谜. 董事会 (8): 104.
    [12]
    谭语嫣, 纪洋, 黄益平. 2017. 利率市场化改革对经济效率的影响. 世界经济 (4): 3−28.
    [13]
    唐国正, 刘力. 2005. 利率管制对我国上市公司资本结构的影响. 管理世界 (1): 50−58.
    [14]
    王东静, 张祥建. 2007. 利率市场化、企业融资与金融机构信贷行为研究. 世界经济 (2): 50−59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9621.2007.02.006
    [15]
    王秋石, 屈宇超. 2020. 经济政策不确定性会加大市场摩擦吗?—基于信贷资本逆向流动的经验证据. 江西社会科学 (8): 39−50.
    [16]
    王万珺, 刘小玄. 2018. 为什么僵尸企业能够长期生存. 中国工业经济 (10): 61−79.
    [17]
    杨筝, 刘放, 李茫茫. 2017. 利率市场化、非效率投资与资本配置—基于中国人民银行取消贷款利率上下限的自然实验. 金融研究 (5): 81−96.
    [18]
    战明华, 应诚炜. 2015. 利率市场化改革、企业产权异质与货币政策广义信贷渠道的效应. 经济研究 (9): 114−126.
    [19]
    Ameer, R. 2003. Financial liberalization and capital structure dynamics in developing countries: Evidence from emerging markets of South East Asia. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    [20]
    Ayyagari, M., K. A. Demirguc, and V. Msksimovic. 2010. Formal versus informal finance: Evidence from China. The Review of Financial Stuides 23(8): 3048−3097. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhq030
    [21]
    Badia, M., and V. Slootmaekers. 2009. The missing link between financial constraints and productivity. IMF Working Paper.
    [22]
    Bai, J., D. Carvalho, and G. M. Phillips. 2018. The impact of bank credit on labor reallocation and aggregate industry productivity. The Journal of Finance 73(6): 2787−2836. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12726
    [23]
    Brandt, L., and H. Li. 2003. Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information or incentives. Journal of Comparative Economics 31(3): 387−413. doi: 10.1016/S0147-5967(03)00080-5
    [24]
    Claessens, S., and K. Tzioumis. 2006. Measuring firms’ access to finance. World Bank and Brooking Conference Paper.
    [25]
    Dinc, I. S. 2005. Politician and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging countries. Journal of Financial Economics 77(2): 453−479. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.011
    [26]
    Gatti, R., and I. Love. 2008. Does access to credit improve productivity? Evidence from Bulgaria. Economics of Transition 16(3): 445−465. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2008.00328.x
    [27]
    Laeven, L. 2003. Does financial liberalization reduce financing constraints? Financial Management 32(1): 5−34. doi: 10.2307/3666202
    [28]
    Omole, D. A., and G. O. Falokun. 1999. Impact of interest rate liberalization on the corporate financing strategies of quoted companies in Nigeria. The African Economic Research Consortium.
    [29]
    Song, Z., K. Storesletten, and F. Zilibotti. 2011. Growing like China. American Economic Review 101(1): 196−233. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.1.196

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(10)

    Article views (261) PDF downloads(2859) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Link 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return