Host: 上海立信会计金融学院

  • ISSN 2096-9554
  • CN 31-2074/F
Volume 34 Issue 5
Oct.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Liu Chun, Sun Liang, Li Yongkang, Cai Qianyi. 2020. Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Corporate Innovation. Accounting and Economic Research, 34(5): 68-88.
Citation: Liu Chun, Sun Liang, Li Yongkang, Cai Qianyi. 2020. Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Corporate Innovation. Accounting and Economic Research, 34(5): 68-88.

Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Corporate Innovation

  • Received Date: 2020-04-09
  • Publish Date: 2020-09-25
  • In this paper, we take China’s A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2018 as the sample to investigate the impact of targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) on corporate innovation activities, concerning the wide participation of firms in TPA. We find that TPA by enterprises significantly increases their innovation. However, TPA does not increase the innovation investment through the input side, but significantly impacts the innovation quality negatively when the innovation structure remains unchanged. Further research shows that the positive effect of TPA on corporate innovation is partly due to the greater convenience of authorization. We make the first focus on companies participating in poverty alleviation and exploration on the black box of the patent application and authorization process. The findings not only provide a new perspective and new evidence for understanding the economic consequences of TPA in China, but also give new ways of thinking about the institutional factors influencing the corporate innovation quality. The government is suggested to be vigilant that some companies take advantage of TPA in some regions to get expedience, and that government-enterprise relations in some regions change from direct resource exchange to more subtle and destructive indirect behaviors.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    郭玥. 2018. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新. 中国工业经济 (9): 98−116.
    [2]
    胡联, 汪三贵. 2017. 我国建档立卡面临精英俘获的挑战吗? 管理世界 (1): 89−98.
    [3]
    黄薇. 2017. 医保政策精准扶贫效果研究—基于URBMI试点评估入户调查数据. 经济研究 (9): 117−132.
    [4]
    孔东民, 徐茗丽, 孔高文. 2017. 企业内部薪酬差距与创新. 经济研究 (10): 144−157.
    [5]
    黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 2016. 实质性创新还是策略性创新? —宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响. 经济研究 (4): 60−73.
    [6]
    李棉管. 2017. 技术难题、政治过程与文化结果—“瞄准偏差”的三种研究视角及其对中国“精准扶贫”的启示. 社会学研究 (1): 217−241, 246.
    [7]
    李棉管. 2019. 自保式低保执行—精准扶贫背景下石村的低保实践. 社会学研究 (6): 188−212, 246.
    [8]
    李万福, 杜静, 张怀. 2017. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资—来自中国上市公司的新证据. 金融研究 (10): 130−145.
    [9]
    林志帆, 龙晓旋. 2019. 卖空威胁能否激励中国企业创新. 世界经济 (9): 126−150.
    [10]
    龙小宁, 易巍, 林志帆. 2018. 知识产权保护的价值有多大? —来自中国上市公司专利数据的经验证据. 金融研究 (8): 120−136.
    [11]
    卢盛峰, 陈思霞, 时良彦. 2018. 走向收入平衡增长: 中国转移支付系统“精准扶贫”了吗? 经济研究 (11): 49−64.
    [12]
    逯东, 黄丹, 杨丹. 2019. 国有企业非实际控制人的董事会权力与并购效率. 管理世界 (6): 119−141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.06.011
    [13]
    倪骁然, 朱玉杰. 2016. 劳动保护、劳动密集度与企业创新—来自2008年劳动合同法实施的证据. 管理世界 (7): 154−167.
    [14]
    王砾, 孔东民, 代昀昊. 2018. 官员晋升压力与企业创新. 管理科学学报 (1): 111−126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2018.01.009
    [15]
    王小鲁, 樊纲, 胡李鹏. 2018. 中国市场化指数—分省份市场化指数报告. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
    [16]
    王雨磊. 2016. 数字下乡: 农村精准扶贫中的技术治理. 社会学研究 (6): 119−142, 244.
    [17]
    殷浩栋, 汪三贵, 郭子豪. 2017. 精准扶贫与基层治理理性—对于A省D县扶贫项目库建设的解构. 社会学研究 (6): 70−93, 243-244.
    [18]
    袁建国, 后青松, 程晨. 2015. 企业政治资源的诅咒效应—基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察. 管理世界 (1): 139−155.
    [19]
    尹志超, 郭沛瑶, 张琳琬. 2020. “为有源头活水来”: 精准扶贫对农户信贷的影响. 管理世界 (2): 59−71,194.
    [20]
    张璇, 刘贝贝, 汪婷, 李春涛. 2017. 信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新. 经济研究 (5): 161−174.
    [21]
    周开国, 卢允之, 杨海生. 2017. 融资约束、创新能力与企业协同创新. 经济研究 (7): 94−108.
    [22]
    周茂, 陆毅, 杜艳, 姚星. 2018. 开发区设立与地区制造业升级. 中国工业经济 (3): 62−79.
    [23]
    朱冰, 张晓亮, 郑晓佳. 2018. 多个大股东与企业创新. 管理世界 (7): 151−165.
    [24]
    朱梦冰, 李实. 2017. 精准扶贫重在精准识别贫困人口—农村低保政策的瞄准效果分析. 中国社会科学 (9): 90−112, 207.
    [25]
    Atanassov. 2013. Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. Journal of Finance 68(3): 1097−1131.
    [26]
    Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26(3): 197−218. doi: 10.1002/smj.441
    [27]
    Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173−1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
    [28]
    Chang, X. S., Y. Chen, S. Q. Wang, K. Zhang, and W. Zhang. 2019. Credit default swaps and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 134(2): 474−500.
    [29]
    Chatterji, A. K., D. I. Levine, and M. W. Toffel. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18(1): 125−169.
    [30]
    Cook, K. A., A. Romi, D. Sanchez, and J. M. Sanchez. 2019. The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 46: 494−537.
    [31]
    Cornaggia, J., Y. Mao, X. Tian, and B. Wolfe. 2015. Does banking competition affect innovation? Journal of Financial Economics 115(1): 189−209. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.001
    [32]
    Deng, X., J. K. Kang, and B. S. Low. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 110(1): 87−109. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.014
    [33]
    Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 9(13): 122−126.
    [34]
    Gallego-Alvarez, I., J. M. Prado-Lorenzo, and I. M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource-based theory. Management Decision 49(9-10): 1709−1727.
    [35]
    Holmstrom, B. 1989. Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 12(3): 305−327.
    [36]
    Hsu, P-H., X. Tian, and Y. Xu. 2014. Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 112: 116−135. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002
    [37]
    Husted, B. W., and D. B. Allen. 2007. Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Academy of Management Review 40: 594−610.
    [38]
    Kim, Y., M. S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87(3): 761−796. doi: 10.2308/accr-10209
    [39]
    Kruger, P. 2015. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 115(2): 304−329. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
    [40]
    Luo, X., and S. Du. 2015. Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Marketing Letters 26(4): 703−714. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5
    [41]
    McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1): 27−117.
    [42]
    Pagano, M., and P. F. Volpin. 2005. The political economy of corporate governance. American Economic Review 95: 1005−1030. doi: 10.1257/0002828054825646
    [43]
    Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22: 435−480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
    [44]
    Surroca, J., and J. A. Tribó. 2008. Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 35(5-6): 748−789. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02090.x
    [45]
    Wu, S. Y., and K. H. Chung. 2019. Corporate innovation, likelihood to be acquired, and takeover premiums. Journal of Banking & Finance 108: 1−20.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(14)

    Article views (303) PDF downloads(887) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Link 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return