Host: 上海立信会计金融学院

  • ISSN 2096-9554
  • CN 31-2074/F
Volume 39 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Chen Zhongtian, Chen Xinxin, Jiang Hongqing. 2025. Research on the Construction of a Government Accounting Disciplinary Community in Chinese Universities. Accounting and Economic Research, 39(2): 96-112.
Citation: Chen Zhongtian, Chen Xinxin, Jiang Hongqing. 2025. Research on the Construction of a Government Accounting Disciplinary Community in Chinese Universities. Accounting and Economic Research, 39(2): 96-112.

Research on the Construction of a Government Accounting Disciplinary Community in Chinese Universities

  • Received Date: 2023-12-13
    Available Online: 2025-11-25
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-25
  • The implementation of the dual-function government accounting standards and systems aims to embed comprehensive accounting control and supervision mechanisms into the fund management systems of government organizations. Given that the scope of government accounting and its verification aligns highly with the scope of government fund flows, its knowledge system inevitably spans across distinct disciplinary categories such as economics and management science. Consequently, the cultivation of government accounting professionals necessitates symbiotic and collaborative mechanisms among these disciplines. However, survey questionnaires distributed to faculty members across universities reveal prevalent issues including unclear disciplinary positioning, narrow curriculum scopes, and inadequate curriculum systems. An effective mechanism aligned with the objectives of government accounting talent cultivation has yet to be established. Universities need to clarify the disciplinary affiliation of government accounting based on the symbiosis theory and the concept of community, construct a disciplinary community centered on the government accounting, coordinate interdisciplinary curriculum systems according to shared community goals and values, and design cross-disciplinary talent cultivation programs for government accounting. Specifically, on one hand, we can introduce related disciplines such as public administration to form an embedded community model. On the other hand, a government accounting track can be established within the accounting major, creating a parallel community model that exists alongside corporate accounting. This approach aims to cultivate interdisciplinary professionals capable of managing government funds.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    柴寿升, 孔令宇, 单军. 2022. 共生理论视角下红色文旅融合发展机理与实证研究——以台儿庄古城为例. 东岳论丛 (4): 121−130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8353.2022.4.dylc202204015
    [2]
    陈文川, 袁璐, 李建发. 2023. 政府会计改革与行政事业单位运营管理绩效. 会计与经济研究 (5): 63−86.
    [3]
    陈振明. 2023. “乌卡时代”公共治理的实践变化与模式重构——有效应对高风险社会的治理挑战. 东南学术 (6): 68−77, 247.
    [4]
    冯琳. 2021. 新时代中国学术期刊与学术共同体构建. 河北学刊 (3): 204−209.
    [5]
    龚维斌, 马骏, 曲福田, 彭国甫, 高小平, 薛澜, 竺乾威, 陈振明, 包国宪, 朱光磊, 周志忍. 2023. 建设高水平学术共同体 推动公共管理学科高质量发展. 中国行政管理 (3): 6−9.
    [6]
    谷磊. 2021. 共生理论下高校在线教学共同体的构建研究. 齐鲁师范学院学报 (2): 31−36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2816.2021.02.005
    [7]
    姜宏青, 郑晓慧. 2024. 我国政府资产负债表重构的理论研究. 会计研究 (2): 87−98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2024.02.006
    [8]
    荆新. 2008. 中国预算会计改革的回顾与展望——纪念改革开放三十周年. 预算管理与会计 (11): 2−4.
    [9]
    荆新. 2018. 中国政府会计改革发展四十年: 回顾与展望. 财会月刊 (19): 3−6.
    [10]
    李建发, 包璐璐, 张国清. 2022. 公共产权视角下政府资产治理问题研究. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (1): 23−35.
    [11]
    李立国. 2022. 跨学科视野下的学科高质量发展. 教育发展研究 (11): 4−6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2022.11.004
    [12]
    梁庆寅, 郑振满, 陈春声, 张小军, 刘志伟, 张侃, 黄向春, 张应强, 郑莉, 李宗翰. 2016. 学术共同体. 开放时代 (4): 11−42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2016.04.001
    [13]
    刘侣萍. 2020. 构建新时代高校思政课教学共同体: 理念与实践. 湖北社会科学 (11): 162−168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8477.2020.11.021
    [14]
    刘志辉, 沈亚平. 2016. 共生理论及其在公共管理学科的适用性研究. 理论月刊 (11): 154−159.
    [15]
    潘俊, 袁璐, 唐凯丽. 2019. 卓越政府会计人才能力框架与评价机制研究. 会计与经济研究 (3): 16−27.
    [16]
    乔·莫兰. 2023. 跨学科: 人文学科的诞生、危机与未来. 陈后亮, 宁艺阳译. 南京: 南京大学出版社.
    [17]
    孙杰远. 2023. 学科发展力与大学变革. 高等教育研究 (5): 1−7.
    [18]
    王飞. 2020. “学术共同体”抑或“学术联合体”——教师学术生活方式的转向. 当代教育科学 (8): 34−39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2020.08.008
    [19]
    王英杰. 2021. 重构学术共同体: 建设世界一流大学的治理制度和组织文化. 比较教育研究 (5): 3−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2021.05.001
    [20]
    魏宏聚. 2009. 厄内斯特·博耶“教学学术”思想的内涵与启示. 全球教育展望 (9): 38−41.
    [21]
    詹姆斯·P·盖拉特. 2003. 21世纪非营利组织管理, 邓国胜译, 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
    [22]
    张通. 2009. 我国预算会计制度改革回顾与展望. 预算管理与会计 (2): 12−17.
    [23]
    张应强, 周钦. 2022. 从学术单位体治理走向学术共同体治理: 我国大学学术治理改革的基本方向. 高等教育研究 (2): 31−41.
    [24]
    Clark, B. R. 2001. The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy and achievement. Higher Education Management 13(2): 9−24.
    [25]
    Goff, L. J. 1982. Symbiosis and parasitism: Another viewpoint. BioScience 32(4): 255−256. doi: 10.2307/1308531
    [26]
    Ryan, S. and J. Guthrie. 2009. Collegial entrepreneurialism: Australian graduate schools of business. Public Management Review 11(3): 317−344.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (13) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Link 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return