Host: 上海立信会计金融学院

  • ISSN 2096-9554
  • CN 31-2074/F
Volume 40 Issue 1
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhao Zhigang, Yu Yao, Wan Shouqiong. 2026. Accounting Theory Challenges and Reflections on the Balance Sheet Recognition of Public Data Resources. Accounting and Economic Research, 40(1): 3-21.
Citation: Zhao Zhigang, Yu Yao, Wan Shouqiong. 2026. Accounting Theory Challenges and Reflections on the Balance Sheet Recognition of Public Data Resources. Accounting and Economic Research, 40(1): 3-21.

Accounting Theory Challenges and Reflections on the Balance Sheet Recognition of Public Data Resources

  • Received Date: 2025-09-12
  • Accepted Date: 2025-10-11
  • Available Online: 2026-09-30
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-20
  • Public data resources serve as fundamental strategic resources for advancing the cultivation of new quality productive forces and promoting high-quality economic and social development. To fully unlock their value potential, it is imperative to establish an accounting institutional system that supports the balance sheet recognition of public data resources. Based on a systematic review of academic literature and policy evolution, this paper analyzes the theoretical challenges in defining accounting entities, recognition, measurement, recording, and reporting when incorporating public data resources into financial statements. The study proposes that, based on the government accounting entities, the definition of assets should be revised and an identification mechanism for public data resources eligible for balance sheet recognition should be introduced. Meanwhile, an accounting measurement framework should be designed to incentivize government accounting entities to explore value realization scenarios, and a framework for accounting recording and reporting should be constructed on the basis of further classification of public data resources. The findings provide valuable insights for advancing the innovation of public data asset accounting system and promoting assetization of public data in China.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    冯博, 李艳婷, 刘龙. 2023. 数据权利界定与收益共享共创: 数字经济下如何化公地悲剧为共同富裕. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报) (8): 3−16.
    [2]
    黄世忠. 2020. 信息资源的七大定律及其确认与计量. 财会月刊 (4): 3−9.
    [3]
    雷一鸣, 周翔. 2025. 公共数据范围界定的方法革新. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版) (4): 181−192.
    [4]
    李爱君. 2025. 推动公共数据供给侧结构性改革促进新质生产力发展. 人民论坛 (14): 68−71.
    [5]
    刘浩, 徐华新. 2023. “控制” 条件、产权束改变与会计准则制定——换入形成表外资产的理论分析. 上海财经大学学报 (3): 108−122.
    [6]
    罗玫, 李金璞, 汤珂. 2023. 企业数据资产化: 会计确认与价值评估. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (5): 195−209, 226.
    [7]
    马雯嘉, 闫胜贺. 2024. 从土地要素向公共数据要素转变: 数据财政发展模式研究. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (6): 45−57.
    [8]
    齐英程. 2021. 作为公物的公共数据资源之使用规则构建. 行政法学研究 (5): 138−147.
    [9]
    沈斌. 2023. 论公共数据的认定标准与类型体系. 行政法学研究 (4): 64−76.
    [10]
    苏宇. 2025. 公共数据质量的制度保障. 行政法学研究 (4): 85−100.
    [11]
    王年. 2025. 公共数据产权的法律构造. 东方法学(网络首发).
    [12]
    王锡锌, 王融. 2023. 公共数据概念的扩张及其检讨. 华东政法大学学报 (4): 17−27.
    [13]
    王志强, 侯丹, 郑石桥. 2025. 政府数据资产审计: 一个理论框架. 会计之友 (7): 127−132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5937.2025.07.018
    [14]
    夏义堃. 2024. 数字环境下公共数据的内涵、边界与划分原则分析. 中国图书馆学报 (2): 100−114.
    [15]
    徐琳, 郑远, 汤珂. 2025. 政务数据资产化: 会计确认与价值评估. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (2): 185−197, 241.
    [16]
    徐伟. 2024. 公共数据权属: 从宪法国家所有到民法国家所有权. 当代法学 (1): 121−133.
    [17]
    尹西明, 聂耀昱, 李振宇, 林镇阳, 赵蓉. 2024. 场景驱动公共数据价值化的理论机制、体系设计与实践模式. 科技创新发展战略研究 (6): 47−60.
    [18]
    曾家瑜, 赵治纲. 2023. 数据资产会计标准研究的进展与展望. 中国注册会计师 (12): 67−73.
    [19]
    张军, 王璐, 王保平. 2025. 数据资产管理进程中的会计治理功能拓展研究. 会计研究 (9): 35−46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2025.09.003
    [20]
    张俊瑞, 危雁麟, 宋晓悦. 2020. 企业数据资产的会计处理及信息列报研究. 会计与经济研究 (3): 3−15.
    [21]
    张鹏, 蒋余浩. 2020. 政务数据资产化管理的基础理论研究: 资产属性、数据权属及定价方法. 电子政务 (9): 61−73.
    [22]
    张倩, 刘浩. 2024. 权利义务凸显、经营活动侧重和所有者扩容——FASB 新概念框架财务报表要素研究. 会计与经济研究 (1): 23−40.
    [23]
    章贵桥, 刘定, 季伟伟. 2024. 数智时代政府会计职能转变的逻辑思路与框架构建. 会计研究 (12): 19−29.
    [24]
    赵正, 杨铭鑫, 易成岐, 聂磊. 2024. 数据财政视角下公共数据有偿使用价值分配的理论基础与政策框架. 电子政务 (2): 21−32.
    [25]
    赵治纲. 2025. 公共数据资产化的核心难点与推进策略. 中国行政管理 (5): 149−152.
    [26]
    赵治纲, 于瑶. 2023. 对当前我国会计研究的反思与展望. 会计研究 (6): 19−30.
    [27]
    郑春燕, 唐俊麒. 2021. 论公共数据的规范含义. 法治研究 (6): 67−79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1455.2021.06.006
    [28]
    Birch, K., S. Marquis, and G. C. Silva. 2024. Understanding data valuation: Valuing Google’s data assets. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 5(2): 183−190. doi: 10.1109/TTS.2024.3398400
    [29]
    Chowdhury, R. H. 2020. Accounting for data: A framework for valuing and reporting digital intangible assets. Journal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research 1(1): 16−23.
    [30]
    FASB. 2021. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No.8, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: Chapter 4, Elements of Financial Statements.
    [31]
    IASB. 2018. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
    [32]
    Jones, C. I., and C. Tonetti. 2020. Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review 110(9): 2819−2858.
    [33]
    Klievink, B., N. Bharosa, and Y. H. Tan. 2016. The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public–private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly 33(1): 67−79.
    [34]
    Nuccio, M., and M. Guerzoni. 2019. Big data: Hell or heaven? Digital platforms and market power in the data-driven economy. Competition & Change 23(3): 312−328.
    [35]
    Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (23) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Link 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return