黄明皓, 李永宁, 肖翔. 2010. 国际碳排放交易市场的有效性研究——基于CER期货市场的价格发现和联动效应分析. 财贸经济 (11):131−137
李刚, 朱莉. 2014. 碳市场、石油市场和股票市场之间的动态相关性研究. 南京财经大学学报 (3): 9−14.
刘纪显, 谢赛赛. 2014. 欧盟EUA与CER两个市场之间的溢出效应研究. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)(1):110−119, 159.
宋楠, 李自然, 曾诗鸿. 2015. 碳市场与大类资产之间的波动信息传导. 资源科学 (6): 1258−1265.
汪文隽, 周婉云, 李瑾, 黄钰. 2016. 中国碳市场波动溢出效应研究. 中国人口·资源与环境 (12): 63−69.
王超, 杨宝臣. 2021. 碳市场对商品、金融市场的溢出效应分析. 南开大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (5):110−122.
王倩, 高翠云. 2016. 中国试点碳市场间的溢出效应研究——基于六元VAR-GARCH-BEKK模型与社会网络分析法. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (6):57−67.
张晨, 刘宇佳. 2017. 基于DGC-MSV-t模型的欧盟碳市场信息流动研究. 软科学 (2): 130−135.
张秋莉, 杨超, 门明. 2012. 国际碳市场与能源市场动态相依关系研究与启示——基于DCC-MVGARCH模型. 经济评论 (5): 112−122, 160.
张希良, 张达, 余润心. 2021. 中国特色全国碳市场设计理论与实践. 管理世界 (8): 80−95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.08.007
Antonakakis, N., D. Gabauer, R. Gupta, and V. Plakandaras. 2018. Dynamic connectedness of uncertainty across developed economies: A time-varying approach. Economics Letters 166(C): 63−75.
Antonakakis, N., and D. Gabauer. 2017. Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on TVP-VAR. MPRA Working Paper.
Balcilar, M., R. Demirer, S. Hammoudeh, and D. K. Nguyen. 2016. Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk. Energy Economics 54(C): 159−172.
Baruník, J., and T. Křehlík. 2018. Measuring the frequency dynamics of financial connectedness and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Econometrics 16(2): 271−296. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nby001
Boubaker, H., and S. A. Raza. 2017. A wavelet analysis of mean and volatility spillovers between oil and BRICS stock markets. Energy Economics 64(C): 105−117.
Chang, K., R. Chen, and J. Chevallier. 2018a. Market fragmentation, liquidity measures and improvement perspectives from China’s emissions trading scheme pilots. Energy Economics 75(C): 249−260.
Chang, K., F. Ge, C. Zhang, and W. Wang. 2018b. The dynamic linkage effect between energy and emissions allowances price for regional emissions trading scheme pilots in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 98(C): 415−425.
Chang, K., S. Lu, and X. Song. 2018c. The impacts of liquidity dynamics on emissions allowances price: Different evidence from China’s emissions trading pilots. Journal of Cleaner Production 183(4): 786−796.
Diebold, F. X., and K. Yılmaz. 2014. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics 182(1): 119−134. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012
Engle, R. F., E. Ghysels, and B. Sohn. 2013. Stock market volatility and macroeconomic fundamentals. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(3): 776−797. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00300
Fan, J. H., and N. Todorova. 2017. Dynamics of China’s carbon prices in the pilot trading phase. Applied Energy 208(46): 1452−1467.
Ferrer, R., S. J. H. Shahzad, R. López, and F. Jareño. 2018. Time and frequency dynamics of connectedness between renewable energy stocks and crude oil prices. Energy Economics 76(C): 1−20.
Gabauer, D., and R. Gupta. 2018. On the transmission mechanism of country-specific and international economic uncertainty spillovers: Evidence from a TVP-VAR connectedness decomposition approach. Economics Letters 171(1): 63−71.
Gabauer, D., and R. Gupta. 2020. Spillovers across macroeconomic, financial and real estate uncertainties: A time-varying approach. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 52(C): 167−173.
Guo, L. Y., and C. Feng. 2021. Are there spillovers among China’s pilots for carbon emission allowances trading? Energy Economics 103(C): 105574.
Han, M., L. Ding, X. Zhao, and W. Kang. 2019. Forecasting carbon prices in the Shenzhen market, China: The role of mixed-frequency factors. Energy171(C): 69−76.
Ji, Q., D. Zhang, and J. Geng. 2018. Information linkage, dynamic spillovers in prices and volatility between the carbon and energy markets. Journal of Cleaner Production 198(5): 972−978.
Jiang, J. J., B. Ye, and X. M. Ma. 2014. The construction of Shenzhen׳ s carbon emission trading scheme. Energy Policy 75(C): 17−21.
Jiang, Y., Y. L. Lei, Y. Z. Yang, and F. Wang. 2018. Factors affecting the pilot trading market of carbon emissions in China. Petroleum Science 15(2): 412−420. doi: 10.1007/s12182-018-0224-3
Jiménez-Rodríguez, R. 2019. What happens to the relationship between EU allowances prices and stock market indices in Europe? Energy Economics 81(C): 13−24.
Jotzo, F., and A. Löschel. 2014. Emissions trading in China: Emerging experiences and international lessons. Energy Policy 75(C): 3−8.
Karplus, V. J., and X. Zhang. 2017. Incentivizing firm compliance with China’s national emissions trading system. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 6(2): 73−86.
Koop, G., and D. Korobilis. 2014. A New Index of Financial Conditions. European Economic Review 71(C): 101−116.
Koop, G., M. H. Pesaran, and S. M. Potter. 1996. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74(1): 119−147. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4
Kumar, S., S. Managi, and A. Matsuda. 2012. Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: A vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Economics 34(1): 215−226. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.002
Lovcha, Y., and A. Perez-Laborda. 2020. Dynamic frequency connectedness between oil and natural gas volatilities. Economic Modelling 84(C): 181−189.
Lundgren, A. I., A. Milicevic, G. S. Uddin, and S. H. Kang. 2018. Connectedness network and dependence structure mechanism in green investments. Energy Economics 72(C): 145−153.
Lv, X., Y. Zhang, X. Li, Q. Zhang, and X. Fan. 2020. Evolution of the spillover effect of pilot carbon markets in China. Evolution 7(2): 11494−11499.
Ma, Y., L. H. Wang, and T. Zhang. 2020. Research on the dynamic linkage among the carbon emission trading, energy and capital markets. Journal of Cleaner Production 272(11): 122717.
Munnings, C., R. D. Morgenstern, Z. Wang, and X. Liu. 2016. Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programs in China. Energy Policy 96(C): 688−699.
Nicola, F. D., P. D. Pace, and M. A. Hernandez. 2016. Co-movement of major energy, agricultural, and food commodity price returns: A time-series assessment. Energy Economics 57(C): 28−41.
Oberndorfer, U. 2009. EU emission allowances and the stock market: evidence from the electricity industry. Ecological Economics 68(4): 1116−1126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.026
Pang, T., and M. Duan. 2016. Cap setting and allowance allocation in China’s emissions trading pilot programmes: special issues and innovative solutions. Climate Policy 16(7): 815−835. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1052956
Pesaran, H. H., and Y. Shin. 1998. Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters 58(1): 17−29. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0
Qi, S., B. Wang, and J. Zhang. 2014. Policy design of the Hubei ETS pilot in China. Energy Policy 75(C): 31−38.
Song, Y., Q. Ji, Y. J. Du, and J. B. Geng. 2019. The dynamic dependence of fossil energy, investor sentiment and renewable energy stock markets. Energy Economics 84(C): 104564.
Tan, X., K. Sirichand, A. Vivian, and X. Wang. 2020. How connected is the carbon market to energy and financial markets: A systematic analysis of spillovers and dynamics. Energy Economics 90(C): 104870.
Wen, F., N. Wu, and X. Gong. 2020. China’s carbon emissions trading and stock returns. Energy Economics 86(C): 104627.
Yu, L., J. Li, L. Tang, and S. Wang. 2015. Linear and nonlinear Granger causality investigation between carbon market and crude oil market: A multi-scale approach. Energy Economics 51(C): 300−311.
Zhang, D., V. J. Karplus, C. Cassisa, and X. Zhang. 2014. Emissions trading in China: Progress and prospects. Energy Policy 75(C): 9−16.
Zhang, J., Z. Wang, and X. Du. 2017. Lessons learned from China’s regional carbon market pilots. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 6(2): 19−38.
Zhao, L., F. Wen, and X. Wang. 2020. Interaction among China carbon emission trading markets: Nonlinear granger causality and time-varying effect. Energy Economics 91(C): 104901.
Zhao, X., L. Wu, and A. Li. 2017. Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79(C): 1−8.
Zhu, B., X. Zhou, X. Liu, H. Wang, K. He, and P. Wang. 2020. Exploring the risk spillover effects among China’s pilot carbon markets: A regular vine copula-CoES approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 242(5): 118455.